81001ISO 81001-1 Revision Checker
The revision record Retrieved 21 October 2026 Stage 40.20 ยท DIS ballot initiated: 12 weeks Planning date 14 Sep 2027, an estimate
Clause5.3Normative
The eight foundational elements

Knowledge transfer

ISO/DIS 81001-1, Clause 5.3Basis: public recordRead 21 October 2026

Knowledge transfer is the second family: risk, safety, security and privacy management, each with communication at the transition points.

What the public record carries

Not stated in the public record beyond the structure. The public contents place a second family at 5.3, covering collaboration within and between organisations, with a general opening and four elements at 5.3.2 to 5.3.5. The first edition's introduction adds that those four, the ones that reach across organisations, carry extra text on how the parties communicate and share information when a major handover happens. The text is not public.

Basis. The public contents list 5.3 Knowledge transfer with a general part and four sub-elements. The first edition's introduction says the four cross-organisational elements carry extra sub-clauses on communication. The text is not public.

Why it matters in a health estate

Knowledge transfer is the element family that makes the life cycle work. A supplier can hold excellent risk, safety, security and privacy processes and still leave the buyer unable to operate the system safely, because what was known in development did not cross the boundary. The four elements are grouped under transfer rather than under management for that reason.

What to do now

For each of the four elements record what must cross each boundary, in what form, at which transition and to whom. Test one transfer end to end and record what arrived and what did not.

The evidence a reviewer will ask for

EvidenceWhat it is
Transfer listWhat must cross each boundary for each of the four elements
Format noteThe form each transfer takes and the level of detail the receiver needs
End-to-end testOne transfer followed from sender to receiver, with what arrived
Receiver confirmationThe receiver's written confirmation that the transfer was usable

What a reviewer will ask

A reviewer will ask what the receiving organisation actually got. A transfer that was sent is not a transfer that was usable.

Common gaps

  • The supplier sends a large document set and the receiver cannot find the operating limits
  • Each element transfers at a different time with no shared schedule
  • The receiver has no way to ask a question after the handover
  • A transfer is recorded as complete when it was sent, not when it was understood

Before the draft publishes

Follow one transfer end to end and write what the receiver could and could not use. Fix the first unusable item.

If the draft changes this row

The draft is edition 2 and 62 pages, one page more than the first edition. Its text and any change summary are not public as at 21 October 2026. This row follows the published first edition's structure, which is what your procedure should name today. The change watch emails you when the record changes or the draft text lands, and the row is re-read then. No one can tell you what moved before that, and this page does not guess.

Related rows

Who this binds. The CISO and the clinical safety officer, because knowledge transfer is the second family of elements and the one that crosses organisations.